TSTP Solution File: ITP090^1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : ITP090^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tqrXMwn5qa true
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 05:22:07 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 1.69s 0.93s
% Output : Refutation 1.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 19
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 39 ( 15 unt; 14 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 53 ( 7 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 167 ( 8 ~; 15 |; 0 &; 137 @)
% ( 4 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 6 ( 5 usr)
% Number of type conns : 9 ( 9 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 12 ( 9 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% ( 3 !!; 0 ??; 0 @@+; 0 @@-)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 3 ^; 15 !; 0 ?; 18 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(secrecy_specID_type,type,
secrecy_specID: $tType ).
thf(secrecy_Expression_type,type,
secrecy_Expression: $tType ).
thf(secrecy_Keys_type,type,
secrecy_Keys: $tType ).
thf(secrecy_KS_type,type,
secrecy_KS: $tType ).
thf(set_Secrecy_KS_type,type,
set_Secrecy_KS: $tType ).
thf(localSecrets_type,type,
localSecrets: secrecy_specID > set_Secrecy_KS ).
thf(secrecy_kKS_type,type,
secrecy_kKS: secrecy_Keys > secrecy_KS ).
thf(knowle945212990e_know_type,type,
knowle945212990e_know: secrecy_specID > secrecy_KS > $o ).
thf(secrecy_kE_type,type,
secrecy_kE: secrecy_Keys > secrecy_Expression ).
thf(q_type,type,
q: secrecy_specID ).
thf(m_type,type,
m: secrecy_KS ).
thf(member_Secrecy_KS_type,type,
member_Secrecy_KS: secrecy_KS > set_Secrecy_KS > $o ).
thf(ine_type,type,
ine: secrecy_specID > secrecy_Expression > $o ).
thf(key_type,type,
key: secrecy_Keys ).
thf(fact_5_sg3a,axiom,
~ ( ine @ q @ ( secrecy_kE @ key ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl5,plain,
~ ( ine @ q @ ( secrecy_kE @ key ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_5_sg3a]) ).
thf(conj_0,conjecture,
~ ( member_Secrecy_KS @ ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) @ ( localSecrets @ q ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
member_Secrecy_KS @ ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) @ ( localSecrets @ q ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[conj_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl355,plain,
member_Secrecy_KS @ ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) @ ( localSecrets @ q ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(fact_1_a1,axiom,
( m
= ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
( m
= ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_1_a1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl358,plain,
member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ ( localSecrets @ q ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl355,zip_derived_cl1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1_001,plain,
( m
= ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_1_a1]) ).
thf(fact_8_know_Osimps_I1_J,axiom,
! [A: secrecy_specID,M: secrecy_Keys] :
( ( knowle945212990e_know @ A @ ( secrecy_kKS @ M ) )
<=> ( ( ine @ A @ ( secrecy_kE @ M ) )
| ( member_Secrecy_KS @ ( secrecy_kKS @ M ) @ ( localSecrets @ A ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl8,plain,
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: secrecy_specID] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y1: secrecy_Keys] :
( ( knowle945212990e_know @ Y0 @ ( secrecy_kKS @ Y1 ) )
<=> ( ( ine @ Y0 @ ( secrecy_kE @ Y1 ) )
| ( member_Secrecy_KS @ ( secrecy_kKS @ Y1 ) @ ( localSecrets @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_8_know_Osimps_I1_J]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl423,plain,
! [X2: secrecy_specID] :
( !!
@ ^ [Y0: secrecy_Keys] :
( ( knowle945212990e_know @ X2 @ ( secrecy_kKS @ Y0 ) )
<=> ( ( ine @ X2 @ ( secrecy_kE @ Y0 ) )
| ( member_Secrecy_KS @ ( secrecy_kKS @ Y0 ) @ ( localSecrets @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl8]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl424,plain,
! [X2: secrecy_specID,X4: secrecy_Keys] :
( ( knowle945212990e_know @ X2 @ ( secrecy_kKS @ X4 ) )
<=> ( ( ine @ X2 @ ( secrecy_kE @ X4 ) )
| ( member_Secrecy_KS @ ( secrecy_kKS @ X4 ) @ ( localSecrets @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference(lazy_cnf_forall,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl423]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl425,plain,
! [X2: secrecy_specID,X4: secrecy_Keys] :
( ( knowle945212990e_know @ X2 @ ( secrecy_kKS @ X4 ) )
= ( ( ine @ X2 @ ( secrecy_kE @ X4 ) )
| ( member_Secrecy_KS @ ( secrecy_kKS @ X4 ) @ ( localSecrets @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference('simplify nested equalities',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl424]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl428,plain,
! [X2: secrecy_specID,X4: secrecy_Keys] :
( ( ine @ X2 @ ( secrecy_kE @ X4 ) )
| ( ( knowle945212990e_know @ X2 @ ( secrecy_kKS @ X4 ) )
= ( $false
| ( member_Secrecy_KS @ ( secrecy_kKS @ X4 ) @ ( localSecrets @ X2 ) ) ) ) ),
inference(bool_hoist,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl425]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl429,plain,
! [X2: secrecy_specID,X4: secrecy_Keys] :
( ( ine @ X2 @ ( secrecy_kE @ X4 ) )
| ( ( knowle945212990e_know @ X2 @ ( secrecy_kKS @ X4 ) )
= ( member_Secrecy_KS @ ( secrecy_kKS @ X4 ) @ ( localSecrets @ X2 ) ) ) ),
inference('simplify boolean subterms',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl428]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl448,plain,
! [X2: secrecy_specID,X4: secrecy_Keys] :
( ( knowle945212990e_know @ X2 @ ( secrecy_kKS @ X4 ) )
| ~ ( member_Secrecy_KS @ ( secrecy_kKS @ X4 ) @ ( localSecrets @ X2 ) )
| ( ine @ X2 @ ( secrecy_kE @ X4 ) ) ),
inference(eq_elim,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl429]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl453,plain,
! [X0: secrecy_specID] :
( ~ ( member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ ( localSecrets @ X0 ) )
| ( ine @ X0 @ ( secrecy_kE @ key ) )
| ( knowle945212990e_know @ X0 @ ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1,zip_derived_cl448]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1_002,plain,
( m
= ( secrecy_kKS @ key ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_1_a1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl457,plain,
! [X0: secrecy_specID] :
( ~ ( member_Secrecy_KS @ m @ ( localSecrets @ X0 ) )
| ( ine @ X0 @ ( secrecy_kE @ key ) )
| ( knowle945212990e_know @ X0 @ m ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl453,zip_derived_cl1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl462,plain,
( ( knowle945212990e_know @ q @ m )
| ( ine @ q @ ( secrecy_kE @ key ) ) ),
inference('sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl358,zip_derived_cl457]) ).
thf(fact_0_not__knowQm,axiom,
~ ( knowle945212990e_know @ q @ m ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
~ ( knowle945212990e_know @ q @ m ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[fact_0_not__knowQm]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl466,plain,
ine @ q @ ( secrecy_kE @ key ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl462,zip_derived_cl0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl469,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl5,zip_derived_cl466]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : ITP090^1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.tqrXMwn5qa true
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 12:31:12 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.36 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.15/0.36 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.36 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.15/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.15/0.36 % Running in HO mode
% 0.22/0.67 % Total configuration time : 828
% 0.22/0.67 % Estimated wc time : 1656
% 0.22/0.67 % Estimated cpu time (8 cpus) : 207.0
% 0.22/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c.s.sh running for 80s
% 0.22/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif4.sh running for 80s
% 0.22/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_c_ic.sh running for 80s
% 0.22/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_e_short1.sh running for 30s
% 0.22/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_noforms.sh running for 90s
% 0.22/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/40_b.comb.sh running for 70s
% 0.22/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/20_acsne_simpl.sh running for 40s
% 1.49/0.80 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_sp5.sh running for 60s
% 1.50/0.82 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/30_b.l.sh running for 90s
% 1.50/0.90 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/35_full_unif.sh running for 56s
% 1.69/0.92 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lams/15_old_s4.sh running for 30s
% 1.69/0.93 % Solved by lams/15_e_short1.sh.
% 1.69/0.93 % done 31 iterations in 0.111s
% 1.69/0.93 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.69/0.93 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.69/0.93
% 1.69/0.93
% 1.69/0.93 % Terminating...
% 1.92/1.03 % Runner terminated.
% 1.92/1.04 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------